The domain name owner can be contacted at the e-mail address [email protected]. Ask him how much he wants for the domain.
We can always just grab a free domain name and change later once the organization gets going. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Colin Hales <[email protected]> wrote: > I didn't buy igi.org > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Benjamin Kapp <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The igi.org domain no longer seems to be offering its self for sale when >> I visit it. Did someone buy it already? >> >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Colin Hales <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Logan, >>> >>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Logan Streondj <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 09:48:03AM +1000, colin hales wrote: >>>> > Sorry about the previous empty. Phone issue. 10 thumbs. >>>> > >>>> > My particular flavour of the non-computer approach is irrelevant. I >>>> am not pushing my own at all. >>>> > >>>> > Robot $ and kind irrelevant. I have the math you speak of. Wrong on >>>> both counts. >>>> > >>>> > I do not care what kind of NC-AGI arises. All I know is that NC-AGI >>>> important, neglected and needs a champion. >>>> >>>> okay so obviously you are the champion. >>>> Why is it important? >>>> >>>> Because it's never been done. >>> >>> >>>> you guys have been talking about it for a week now, >>>> and I still have no idea why you think it has value. >>>> >>>> like lets be honest here, anything that isn't a computer or >>>> technology is biology. so what you are really talking about >>>> (seems to me) is biological-AGI, or connecting a vat of >>>> brain-cells to a computer. >>>> this has been done, and can play simple video games. >>>> but so can deep neuronets on computers. >>>> >>> >>> No it is not necessarily biology. H-AGI can use biological material or >>> make inorganic versions of the biological substrate. Mine is totally >>> inorganic. >>> >>> And while hooking bio material to other hardware has been done, it has >>> not been done by anyone headed in the direction of an AGI. Pure wet >>> neuroscience? Yes. Machine learning? Yes. Robot control? Yes. This >>> particular approach is not what I intend. Dorian may be more interested in >>> that. I don't want to stop anyone doing any of it just because it clashes >>> with my own vision of it. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > So please set anything you think you know about me or my approach >>>> aside. You actually know almost nothing and what little that is is >>>> irrelevant to what is happening in this thread. >>>> >>>> okay so do you have some kind of proprietary secret approach? >>>> >>>> I was thinking you can Dorian can sign an NDA and then no one >>>> will ever know about anything you guys do. >>>> >>>> personally I think that there are a lot of potential ethical >>>> issues with using biological mediums for computation, also they >>>> aren't particularly scalable or portable. >>>> >>>> >>>> I can see scalability. I can see portability. I can see generativity. >>> It will be clunky at first like all new ideas. It has an organic and an >>> inorganic aspect. All untried as H-AGI. >>> >>> Both Dorian and I have written up and published everything that is >>> needed to get your head round the fundamentals, which I know can be hard to >>> see for those without the biophysics. We have both argued for a long time, >>> one way or another, that the approach is novel. The one-liner explanation: >>> >>> *H-AGI is where the brain physics essential to an AGI is identified and >>> included in an AGI substrate. This is achieved by actually replicating the >>> physics (organic/inorganic, doesn't matter) and including that physics on >>> the substrate then and testing its performance against alternatives that >>> lack that physics (i.e. that might ignore it or model it, replacing it with >>> the physics of the instantiation of the model, whatever that might be).* >>> >>> So it's rather simple. Both Dorian and I have identified candidate >>> 'low-hanging fruit' physics. There may be others. That physics may be the >>> crucial missing link that has dogged AGI for decades. If so, then all >>> activity that did not include that essential physics was actually destined >>> to underperform in mysterious ways that it is H-AGIs job to sort out. The >>> IGI, if it existed, would do that. >>> >>> Yes there are heaps of ethical issues with any AGI approach. The H-AGI >>> inorganic version will have one ethics/risk landscape, the H-AGI organic >>> version another. Both of these will contrast with the C-AGI risk landscape. >>> In what ways? I dunno! Let's find out! >>> >>> regards >>> >>> Colin Hales >>> >>> >>> >>> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee> | >>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription >>> <http://www.listbox.com> >>> >> >> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11721311-20a65d4a> | >> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription >> <http://www.listbox.com> >> > > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee> | > Modify > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> > Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
