I'm not a web developer as such. But I can set up Wordpress and a forum if you like.
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:06 PM, colin hales <[email protected]> wrote: > Excellent.. It'll do for now.. Am not a web dev guy. Plant a flag and let > it sit. Someone will have to own its development for a bit. While some > proposed content takes shape. It doesn't have to be pretty! > > Time zone issues here. Gotta go. > > Regards > Colin > ------------------------------ > From: Benjamin Kapp <[email protected]> > Sent: 20/05/2015 11:47 AM > To: AGI <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [agi] Institute of General Intelligence (IGI) > > I registered a free domain name > INSTITUTEOFGENERALINTELLIGENCE.TK > > it is pointing to Mark's name servers. Who wants to create a hello world > web page so we can test it? > > > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Colin Hales <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I put in a backorder and found out igi.org t was gone afterwards. Doh. >> Does the predation have to start so soon? There's always a shark. >> OK. I'll ask. May take a while. >> Dorian... It's your name. Have you any alternatives if this shark turns >> out to be too hungry? >> Leave it there for the moment.a >> :-) >> colin >> >> >> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Benjamin Kapp <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> The domain name owner can be contacted at the e-mail address >>> [email protected]. Ask him how much he wants for the domain. >>> >>> We can always just grab a free domain name and change later once the >>> organization gets going. >>> >>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Colin Hales <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I didn't buy igi.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Benjamin Kapp <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The igi.org domain no longer seems to be offering its self for sale >>>>> when I visit it. Did someone buy it already? >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Colin Hales <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Logan, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Logan Streondj <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 09:48:03AM +1000, colin hales wrote: >>>>>>> > Sorry about the previous empty. Phone issue. 10 thumbs. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > My particular flavour of the non-computer approach is irrelevant. >>>>>>> I am not pushing my own at all. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Robot $ and kind irrelevant. I have the math you speak of. Wrong >>>>>>> on both counts. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I do not care what kind of NC-AGI arises. All I know is that >>>>>>> NC-AGI important, neglected and needs a champion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> okay so obviously you are the champion. >>>>>>> Why is it important? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because it's never been done. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> you guys have been talking about it for a week now, >>>>>>> and I still have no idea why you think it has value. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> like lets be honest here, anything that isn't a computer or >>>>>>> technology is biology. so what you are really talking about >>>>>>> (seems to me) is biological-AGI, or connecting a vat of >>>>>>> brain-cells to a computer. >>>>>>> this has been done, and can play simple video games. >>>>>>> but so can deep neuronets on computers. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> No it is not necessarily biology. H-AGI can use biological material >>>>>> or make inorganic versions of the biological substrate. Mine is totally >>>>>> inorganic. >>>>>> >>>>>> And while hooking bio material to other hardware has been done, it >>>>>> has not been done by anyone headed in the direction of an AGI. Pure wet >>>>>> neuroscience? Yes. Machine learning? Yes. Robot control? Yes. This >>>>>> particular approach is not what I intend. Dorian may be more interested >>>>>> in >>>>>> that. I don't want to stop anyone doing any of it just because it clashes >>>>>> with my own vision of it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > So please set anything you think you know about me or my approach >>>>>>> aside. You actually know almost nothing and what little that is is >>>>>>> irrelevant to what is happening in this thread. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> okay so do you have some kind of proprietary secret approach? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was thinking you can Dorian can sign an NDA and then no one >>>>>>> will ever know about anything you guys do. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> personally I think that there are a lot of potential ethical >>>>>>> issues with using biological mediums for computation, also they >>>>>>> aren't particularly scalable or portable. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can see scalability. I can see portability. I can see >>>>>> generativity. It will be clunky at first like all new ideas. It has an >>>>>> organic and an inorganic aspect. All untried as H-AGI. >>>>>> >>>>>> Both Dorian and I have written up and published everything that is >>>>>> needed to get your head round the fundamentals, which I know can be hard >>>>>> to >>>>>> see for those without the biophysics. We have both argued for a long >>>>>> time, >>>>>> one way or another, that the approach is novel. The one-liner >>>>>> explanation: >>>>>> >>>>>> *H-AGI is where the brain physics essential to an AGI is identified >>>>>> and included in an AGI substrate. This is achieved by actually >>>>>> replicating the physics (organic/inorganic, doesn't matter) and including >>>>>> that physics on the substrate then and testing its performance against >>>>>> alternatives that lack that physics (i.e. that might ignore it or model >>>>>> it, >>>>>> replacing it with the physics of the instantiation of the model, whatever >>>>>> that might be).* >>>>>> >>>>>> So it's rather simple. Both Dorian and I have identified candidate >>>>>> 'low-hanging fruit' physics. There may be others. That physics may be the >>>>>> crucial missing link that has dogged AGI for decades. If so, then all >>>>>> activity that did not include that essential physics was actually >>>>>> destined >>>>>> to underperform in mysterious ways that it is H-AGIs job to sort out. The >>>>>> IGI, if it existed, would do that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes there are heaps of ethical issues with any AGI approach. The >>>>>> H-AGI inorganic version will have one ethics/risk landscape, the H-AGI >>>>>> organic version another. Both of these will contrast with the C-AGI risk >>>>>> landscape. In what ways? I dunno! Let's find out! >>>>>> >>>>>> regards >>>>>> >>>>>> Colin Hales >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >>>>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee> | >>>>>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription >>>>>> <http://www.listbox.com> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >>>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11721311-20a65d4a> | >>>>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription >>>>> <http://www.listbox.com> >>>>> >>>> >>>> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee> | >>>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription >>>> <http://www.listbox.com> >>>> >>> >>> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11721311-20a65d4a> | >>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription >>> <http://www.listbox.com> >>> >> >> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee> | >> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription >> <http://www.listbox.com> >> > > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11721311-20a65d4a> | > Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription > <http://www.listbox.com> > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/27079473-66e47b26> | > Modify > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> > Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> > -- Regards, Mark Seveland ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
