On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:21:34PM +0200, Ophir Shai wrote:

> Google Sets is able to find a common match between 2 words, and find
> additional words in the sequence. This is certainly a measurement for
> intelligence (which is done in psychometric tests).

By that measure, a paper and pen (nevermind that man behind the curtain doing
all the work of answering your queries) would qualify.

Finding simple patterns in human input is not very intelligent.  

I'm surprised some AI people are setting their sights so low as to look for
general intelligence in artifacts which are designed to do simple tasks.

Now if Google would cluster images by machine vision solely, that would be
something. 

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a>
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144            http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
http://moleculardevices.org         http://nanomachines.net

-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: pgpImEg9z7gbl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to