> By that measure, a paper and pen (nevermind that man behind the curtain doing > all the work of answering your queries) would qualify.
But there's no man behind Google's curtain. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eugen Leitl Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 12:32 PM To: agi@v2.listbox.com Subject: Re: [agi] Google as a strong AI On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:21:34PM +0200, Ophir Shai wrote: > Google Sets is able to find a common match between 2 words, and find > additional words in the sequence. This is certainly a measurement for > intelligence (which is done in psychometric tests). By that measure, a paper and pen (nevermind that man behind the curtain doing all the work of answering your queries) would qualify. Finding simple patterns in human input is not very intelligent. I'm surprised some AI people are setting their sights so low as to look for general intelligence in artifacts which are designed to do simple tasks. Now if Google would cluster images by machine vision solely, that would be something. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ This email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-Secure and has been found clean. ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
