RE: [agi] Google as a strong AI

[Ben Goertzel]

Cyc, SOAR and Novamente are all closer to strong AI than Google, since they can carry out a greater variety of intelligence-like functions.   According to my understanding, Google is not significantly more of a strong AI than "Virtual Kasparov chess" for the Gameboy advance....  Neither is a general intelligence, neither has any reflective capability, each does a particular thing and does it well...   ben -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 1:41 AM To: agi@v2.listbox.com Subject: Re: [agi] Google as a strong AI Dennis,   >what program is a better implementation of strong AI than Google?   Any application that supports various types of reasoning is closer to strong AI than Google. Used algorithms are more important than the amount of data available for initial testing.   Sincerely, Jiri Jelinek     In a message dated 3/13/2005 11:52:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > If you think Google is "strong AI" then we have really different definitions > of that term, what can I say... > Google is narrow AI, if it's AI at all.  It's great, of course.. but ... Ok, let's see: 1) Google reads Natural Language. Every natural language. Google write Natural Language. 2) Google constantly learns. Learning affects Google behavior. 3) Google knows words and phrases. Google distinguishes between usual and unusual (wrong/misspelled/...) words. 4) Google's memory is implemented in form of dynamic Neural Net. 5) Google has huge memory. Now, it's your turn: what program is a better implementation of strong AI than Google? To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]