----- Original Message -----
From: Gregory
Johnson >Provide the AGI with the hardware and software to jack into one or more
human
>brains and let the bio-software of the human brain be the language interface development tool. Jacking into the human brain? That is hardly
a shortcut to AGI, if we are to invent AGI in the next 30 or 40 years. We
are a long ways off from being able to use the human brain the way you
mention.
>Some of the drivers that bring humans together such as social
relations and sexual relations perhaps can be learned by >an AGI
and perhaps we can pussywhip an antisocial AGI into a friendly AGI.
Could you elaborate on this? I don't see the
reliability of comparing an AGI's motivations with human
motivation.
Mark N This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- Re: [agi] Natural versus formal AI interface language... Mark Nuzzolilo II
- Re: [agi] Natural versus formal AI interface lan... Eric Baum
- Re: [agi] Natural versus formal AI interface... Pei Wang
- Re: [agi] Natural versus formal AI inter... Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
- Re: [agi] Natural versus formal AI i... Pei Wang
- Re: [agi] Natural versus formal AI i... Eric Baum
- Re: [agi] Natural versus formal... Pei Wang
- Re: [agi] Natural versus formal AI i... Richard Loosemore
- Re: [agi] Natural versus formal AI interface lan... James Ratcliff
- Re: [agi] Natural versus formal AI interface lan... Russell Wallace
- RE: [agi] Natural versus formal AI interface... Jef Allbright