Consistency in the sense of de Finetti or Cox is out of reach for a
modest-resources AGI, in principle...
Sorry to be the one to break the news. But, don't blame the
messenger. It's a rough universe out there ;-)
Ben G
On Feb 6, 2007, at 4:10 PM, gts wrote:
I understand the resources problem, but to be coherent a
probabilistic reasoner need only be constrained in very simple
ways, for example from assigning a higher probability to statement
2 than to statement 1 when statement 2 is contingent on statement 1.
Is such basic coherency totally out of reach for an AGI, *in
principle*? I hope not.
-gts
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
