On 11/1/07, Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > More importantly, I've started struggling with representing > conversational state. i.e. "what are we talking about?" "what > has been said so far?" I've got some inkling on how to expand > conversational state, but its ad hoc so far. > > Thus, I find that my interests are now turning to representing > conversational state. How does novamente deal with it? What > about Pei Wang's NARS? It seems that NARS is a reasoning system; > great; but what is holding me back right now is not an ability > to reason per-se, but the ability to maintain a conversational > state.
I haven't done anything concrete on NLP yet. For why NLP is treated as an optional part of NARS and my plan for it, see http://nars.wang.googlepages.com/wang.roadmap.pdf As for what you called "conversational state", my plan is to remember the past conversation as "events", not as explicitly defined "states" (as those defined in search or planning systems). Pei ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=60167943-7f8e6f
