Ed,
> At the current stages this may be true, but it should be remembered that
> building a human-level AGI would be creating a machine that would itself,
> with the appropriate reading and training, be able to design and program
> AGIs.
No.
AGI is not necessarily that capable. In fact first versions of AGI
would not be that capable for sure.
Consider middle age peasant, for example. Such peasant has general
intelligence ("GI" part in "AGI"), right?
What kind of training would you provide to such peasant in order to
make him design AGI?
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=70651687-aa8ee6
