> From: Mike Tintner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Charles: >> I don't think a General Intelligence could be built entirely
> out
> of
> >> narrow AI components, but it might well be a relatively trivial add-
> on.
> >> Just consider how much of human intelligence is demonstrably "narrow
> AI"
> >> (well, not artificial, but you know what I mean).  Object
> recognition,
> >> e.g.  Then start trying to guess how much of the part that we can't
> >> prove a classification for is likely to be a narrow intelligence
> >> component.  In my estimation (without factual backing) less than
> 0.001
> >> of our intelligence is General Intellignece, possibly much less.
> >> >
> >
> John:  I agree that it may be <1%. >
> >
> 
> Oh boy, does this strike me as absurd. Don't have time for the theory
> right
> now, but just had to vent. Percentage estimates strike me as a bit
> silly,
> but if you want to aim for one, why not look at both your paragraphs,
> word
> by word. "Don't"  "think" "might" "relatively" etc. Now which of those
> words
> can only be applied to a single type of activity, rather than an open-
> ended
> set of activities? Which cannot be instantiated in an open-ended if not
> infinite set of ways? Which is not a very valuable if not key tool of a
> General Intelligence, that can adapt to solve problems across domains?
> Language IOW is the central (but not essential) instrument of human
> general
> intelligence - and I can't think offhand of a single world that is not a
> tool for generalising across domains, including "Charles H." and "John
> G.".
> 
> In fact, every tool you guys use - logic, maths etc. - is similarly
> general
> and functions in similar ways. The above strikes me as a 99% failure to
> understand the nature of general intelligence.
> 

Mike you are 100% potentially right with a margin of error of 110%. LOL!

Seriously Mike how do YOU indicate approximations? And how are you
differentiating general and specific? And declaring relative absolutes and
convenient infinitudes... I'm trying to understand your argument.

John

-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=98558129-0bdb63
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to