On 4/18/08, Mark Waser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes. RAM is *HUGE*. Intelligence is *NOT*. > > > > Really? I will believe that if I see more evidence... right now I'm > skeptical. > > And your *opinion* has what basis? Are you arguing that RAM isn't huge? > That's easily disprovable. Or are you arguing that intelligence is huge? > That too is easily disprovable. Which one do I need to knock down?
The current OpenCyc KB is ~200 Mbs (correct me if I'm wrong). The RAM size of current high-end PCs is ~10 Gbs. My intuition estimates that the current OpenCyc is only about 10%-40% of a 5 year-old human intelligence. Plus, learning requires that we store a lot of hypotheses. Let's say 1000-10000 times the real KB. That comes to 500Gb - 20Tb. It seems that if we allow several years for RAM size to double a few times, RAM may have a chance to catch up to the low end. Obviously not now. YKY ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=101455710-f059c4 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
