Plus, learning requires that we store a lot of hypotheses. Let's say
1000-10000 times the real KB.
I reject this hypothesis as ludicrously incorrect.
----- Original Message -----
From: "YKY (Yan King Yin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <agi@v2.listbox.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] database access fast enough?
On 4/18/08, Mark Waser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes. RAM is *HUGE*. Intelligence is *NOT*.
>
> Really? I will believe that if I see more evidence... right now I'm
skeptical.
And your *opinion* has what basis? Are you arguing that RAM isn't huge?
That's easily disprovable. Or are you arguing that intelligence is huge?
That too is easily disprovable. Which one do I need to knock down?
The current OpenCyc KB is ~200 Mbs (correct me if I'm wrong).
The RAM size of current high-end PCs is ~10 Gbs.
My intuition estimates that the current OpenCyc is only about 10%-40%
of a 5 year-old human intelligence.
Plus, learning requires that we store a lot of hypotheses. Let's say
1000-10000 times the real KB.
That comes to 500Gb - 20Tb.
It seems that if we allow several years for RAM size to double a few
times, RAM may have a chance to catch up to the low end. Obviously
not now.
YKY
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=101455710-f059c4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
