On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Jey Kottalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This list is being dominated by nonsense because the scientifically > grounded people on this list don't want to take the time to refute > every piece of fantastic drivel. I certainly don't blame them for > wanting to focus on their time on other more productive projects, but > it ultimately reflects poorly on the list and scares away > scientifically grounded AGI newbies by reinforcing the idea that AGI > is the exclusive domain of "crackpots". >
It's hard to refute something vague or irrelevant, with 10 volumes of Astrology background behind it, and it's not necessary, as nonsense is usually self-evident. What's needed is merciless moderation... -- Vladimir Nesov [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=103754539-40ed26 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
