> From: BillK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 8:37 PM, John G. Rose wrote: > >> It's hard to refute something vague or irrelevant, with 10 volumes of > >> Astrology background behind it, and it's not necessary, as nonsense > is > >> usually self-evident. What's needed is merciless moderation... > > > > > > I think it's overdue for someone to get a good Waseration. > > > > > That's a good one! Google has zero hits for Waseration. > > Explanation, please? > > BillK >
See April 2, 2008 flame from Waser under Re: [agi] Symbols. Gosh that was a good one... John ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=103754539-40ed26 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
