Mike Tintner wrote > You partly illustrate my point - you talk of "artificial brains" as if > they actually exist
That's the magic of thinking in scenarios. For you it may appear as if we couldn't differentiate between reality and a thought experiment. > By implicitly pretending that artificial "brains" exist - in the form of > computer programs - you (and most AGI-ers), deflect attention away from > all > the unsolved dimensions of what is required for an independent > brain-cum-living system, natural or artificial. Then bring this topic up. But please in an educated way and not with the same half-understanding of AGI and math you demonstrate here. But to be honest I expect you to talk about this with your usual misunderstandings and then wonder that nobody (positively) reacts on that--and then you'll again run around and whine that we don't get it. (And what's an artificial brain-cum-living system?) > Yes you may know these things "some times" as you say, but most of the > time > they're forgotten. There are other topics that often require more focus at this time. People are working on details you usually don't understand and don't care to understand. ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
