Arthur, Thanks. I appreciate that. I would be happy to aggregate some of those things. I am sometimes not good at maintaining the website because I get bored of maintaining or updating it very quickly :)
Dave On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:02 AM, A. T. Murray <menti...@scn.org> wrote: > The Web site of David Jones at > > http://practicalai.org > > is quite impressive to me > as a kindred spirit building AGI. > (Just today I have been coding MindForth AGI :-) > > For his "Practical AI Challenge" or similar > ventures, I would hope that David Jones is > open to the idea of aggregating or archiving > "representative AI samples" from such sources as > - TexAI; > - OpenCog; > - Mentifex AI; > - etc.; > so that visitors to PracticalAI may gain an > overview of what is happening in our field. > > Arthur > -- > http://www.scn.org/~mentifex/AiMind.html<http://www.scn.org/%7Ementifex/AiMind.html> > http://www.scn.org/~mentifex/mindforth.txt<http://www.scn.org/%7Ementifex/mindforth.txt> > > > > >lol. thanks Jim :) > > > > > >On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Jim Bromer <jimbro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I have to say that I am proud of David Jone's efforts. He has really > >> matured during these last few months. I'm kidding but I really do > respect > >> the fact that he is actively experimenting. I want to get back to work > on > >> my artificial imagination and image analysis programs - if I can ever > figure > >> out how to get the time. > >> > >> As I have read David's comments, I realize that we need to really > leverage > >> all sorts of cruddy data in order to make good agi. But since that kind > of > >> thing doesn't work with sparse knowledge, it seems that the only way it > >> could work is with extensive knowledge about a wide range of situations, > >> like the knowledge gained from a vast variety of experiences. This > >> conjecture makes some sense because if wide ranging knowledge could be > kept > >> in superficial stores where it could be accessed quickly and > economically, > >> it could be used efficiently in (conceptual) model fitting. However, as > >> knowledge becomes too extensive it might become too unwieldy to find > what is > >> needed for a particular situation. At this point indexing becomes > necessary > >> with cross-indexing references to different knowledge based on > similarities > >> and commonalities of employment. > >> > >> Here I am saying that relevant knowledge based on previous learning > might > >> not have to be totally relevant to a situation as long as it could be > used > >> to run during an ongoing situation. From this perspective > >> then, knowledge from a wide variety of experiences should actually be > >> composed of reactions on different conceptual levels. Then as a piece > of > >> knowledge is brought into play for an ongoing situation, those levels > that > >> seem best suited to deal with the situation could be promoted quickly as > the > >> situation unfolds, acting like an automated indexing system into other > >> knowledge relevant to the situation. So the ongoing process of trying > to > >> determine what is going on and what actions should be made would > >> simultaneously act like an automated index to find better knowledge more > >> suited for the situation. > >> Jim Bromer > > > ------------------------------------------- > agi > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ > Modify Your Subscription: > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
