Mike Tintner wrote: > What will be the SIMPLEST thing that will mark the first sign of AGI ? - > Given >that there are zero but zero examples of AGI. Machines have already surpassed human intelligence. If you don't think so, try this IQ test. http://mattmahoney.net/iq/
Or do you prefer to define intelligence as "more like a human"? In that case I agree that AGI will never happen. No machine will ever be more like a human than a human. I really don't care how you define it. Either way, computers are profoundly affecting the way people interact with each other and with the world. Where is the threshold when machines do most of our thinking for us? Who cares as long as the machines still give us the feeling that we are in charge. -- Matt Mahoney, matmaho...@yahoo.com ________________________________ From: Mike Tintner <tint...@blueyonder.co.uk> To: agi <agi@v2.listbox.com> Sent: Fri, August 6, 2010 5:57:33 AM Subject: Re: [agi] Epiphany - Statements of Stupidity sTEVE:I have posted plenty about "statements of ignorance", our probable inability to comprehend what an advanced intelligence might be "thinking", What will be the SIMPLEST thing that will mark the first sign of AGI ? - Given that there are zero but zero examples of AGI. Don't you think it would be a good idea to begin at the beginning? With "initial AGI"? Rather than "advanced AGI"? agi | Archives | Modify Your Subscription ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
