Taral wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: >> ========================= Criminal Case 2383 ========================= >> >> Sgeo violated rule 1750 by failing to read the ruleset during >> Read the Ruleset week, and also failing to understand or to >> carefully weigh the consequences of this failure. > > GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY! > > I sentence Sgeo to SILENCE.
I intend (with 2 support) to appeal this judgement on culpability. At least explain /why/ you're going against my intent that SHOULD/should would be recursively non-binding.
