-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Charles Reiss wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 18:26, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: >> Taral wrote: >>> I sentence Sgeo to SILENCE. >> >> I intend (with 2 support) to appeal this judgement on culpability. At >> least explain /why/ you're going against my intent that SHOULD/should >> would be recursively non-binding. > > I support this.
As do I. I feel, as a matter of general principle, that overturning the obvious interpretation of a passage of ruletext requires arguments. Pavitra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJpQroyUdQDqgQe30RAp7sAKDMkiTsKTMBg7eYj8cgIt4p+3ut2wCgubSo D6Oo5KsMg+oyUo4RWZ99jjU= =dusB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
