On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 18:26, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > Taral wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> ========================= Criminal Case 2383 ========================= >>> >>> Sgeo violated rule 1750 by failing to read the ruleset during >>> Read the Ruleset week, and also failing to understand or to >>> carefully weigh the consequences of this failure. >> >> GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY! >> >> I sentence Sgeo to SILENCE. > > I intend (with 2 support) to appeal this judgement on culpability. At > least explain /why/ you're going against my intent that SHOULD/should > would be recursively non-binding.
I support this. -woggle
