Pavitra wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Charles Reiss wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 18:26, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Taral wrote: >>>> I sentence Sgeo to SILENCE. >>> I intend (with 2 support) to appeal this judgement on culpability. At >>> least explain /why/ you're going against my intent that SHOULD/should >>> would be recursively non-binding. >> I support this. > > As do I. I feel, as a matter of general principle, that overturning > the obvious interpretation of a passage of ruletext requires arguments.
With support from woggle and Pavitra, I appeal the aforementioned judgement on culpability.
