On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Sean Hunt<[email protected]> wrote: > Ed Murphy wrote: >> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2544a > > I opine REASSIGN. REMAND would normally be appropriate in this > situation, however, the case now has an interest index higher than the > former judge's judicial rank; a reassignment does not seem logical.
I concur and opine REASSIGN.
