coppro wrote: > Benjamin Caplan wrote: >> Sean Hunt wrote: >>> Ed Murphy wrote: >>>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2544a >>> I opine REASSIGN. REMAND would normally be appropriate in this >>> situation, however, the case now has an interest index higher than the >>> former judge's judicial rank; a reassignment does not seem logical. >>> >> REASSIGN, because of; clearly, so it follows that and therefore. > > I transfer a prop from Rodlen to Pavitra because. > > (note to the ATC: there is a reason here that should be reasonably be > inferred. I believe the transfer is successful).
No, sorry, your reason for choosing Pavitra is reasonably obvious but your reason for choosing Rodlen is not.
