On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Sean Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote: > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2544a > > I opine REASSIGN. REMAND would normally be appropriate in this > situation, however, the case now has an interest index higher than the > former judge's judicial rank; a reassignment does not seem logical. > > I also judge REASSIGN.
