Sean Hunt wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2544a
> 
> I opine REASSIGN. REMAND would normally be appropriate in this
> situation, however, the case now has an interest index higher than the
> former judge's judicial rank; a reassignment does not seem logical.
> 
REASSIGN, because of; clearly, so it follows that and therefore.

Reply via email to