I defer to Cuddlebeam on judging this. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:06 AM, CuddleBeam <cuddleb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I express extreme interest in seeing this CFJ be judged. > > > I also declare that I would like to judge this CFJ if no other volunteers for > such a task are readily available at the time that a Judge would be assigned. > > ---- > Cuddlebeam > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I explicitly ask to not judge this CFJ > > > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:06 Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I submit a Call for Judgement for the following statement: > >> > >> "Every statement is ambiguous." > >> > >> I present the following argument as caller's evidence: > >> * Every statement is written in one language. > >> * Translation between any two languages is inherently ambiguous. > >> * Therefore, every statement is ambiguous at least in every language > >> the statement was not originally written in. > >> * Agora does not formally make preference to any one language, and > >> recognizes differences in dialect (CFJ 1439). > >> * Thus, every statement is ambiguous. > >> > >> 天火狐 > >> > > > >
