I submit the following evidence and recommend DISMISS:
-The caller gives no indication of how this affects or relates to gameplay, so it's irrelevant.
I submit the following evidence and recommend AGAINST if DISMISS is not accepted:
-"Translation between any two languages is inherently ambiguous." is an untrue statement. There is no such rule in language.-'Ambiguous' in the rules refers to player interpretation, not some unknowable objective mark. -Because ambiguity is determined case-by-case, it's impossible (and fruitless) to make a statement about the ambiguity of every statement.
On 05/19/2017 02:06 PM, Josh T wrote:
I submit a Call for Judgement for the following statement: "Every statement is ambiguous." I present the following argument as caller's evidence: * Every statement is written in one language. * Translation between any two languages is inherently ambiguous.* Therefore, every statement is ambiguous at least in every language the statement was not originally written in. * Agora does not formally make preference to any one language, and recognizes differences in dialect (CFJ 1439).* Thus, every statement is ambiguous. 天火狐
