I vote as follows:
On 10/28/2017 02:27 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> [Hopefully I've got everything right. The Proposal Pool will take a
> few more days, and may even be a bit late. My apologies for any
> inconvenience.]
>
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> quorum is 5.0 and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is
> also a valid vote).
>
> ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend fee
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 7931* G. 3.0 Registration fix finally G. 1 sh.
FOR
> 7932* ATMunn, [1] 1.0 A Reward for Obedience v5 ATMunn 1 AP
FOR
> 7933* Alexis 3.0 Ribbon Preservation Act Alexis 1 sh.
FOR
> 7934* 天火狐 1.0 Poetry Duel Challenge Writ 天火狐 OP [2]
FOR
> 7935* Trigon 3.0 Revision Limits v2 Trigon 1 AP
AGAINST
> 7936* V.J. Rada 2.0 Print Money V.J. Rada 1 AP
FOR
> 7937* V.J. Rada, o 2.0 I Demand Faster Auctions V.J. Rada 1 AP
AGAINST
> 7938* Aris 3.0 Fix Campaign Proposals Aris 1 AP
FOR
> 7939* V.J. Rada 1.0 Repeal the Reportor V.J. Rada 1 sh.
AGAINST
> 7940* Alexis, [3] 3.0 High Power Cleanup Alexis 1 sh.
FOR
> 7941* Alexis 1.0 HTML Scrubbing Alexis 1 sh.
FOR
> 7942* Alexis 1.0 No List Prefixes Alexis 1 sh.
AGAINST
> 7943* ATMunn 2.0 Mini fixes ATMunn 1 sh.
FOR
> 7944* Trigon 2.0 Who's the Secretary? Trigon 1 AP
AGAINST, this would fail because the order is not specified.
> 7945* Telnaior 1.0 Name and Shame Telnaior 1 AP
FOR
> 7946* Telnaior 3.0 MASUAC [4] Telnaior 1 AP
FOR
> 7947* V.J. Rada, [5] 3.0 MCVotA [6] V.J. Rada 2 sh.
FOR
> Legend: <ID>* : Proposal is pending.
>
> [1] Aris, Alexis, G.
> [2] Official Proposal, inherently pending
> [3] G., Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> [4] More Actions Should Use Agoran Consent
> [5] Telnaior
> [6] More Controversial Version of the Above
>
> A proposal may be pended for 1 AP, or for 1/20th the Floating Value
> in shines (see the Treasuror's report).
>
> The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7931
> Title: Registration fix finally
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: G.
> Co-authors:
>
>
> [It looks like we have various ways for players to make money now so
> the re-registration bug can be fixed. Also clearly defines the verb
> "to register" and makes it clear that registered persons can't "re"
> register].
>
>
> Amend Rule 869 (How to Join and Leave Agora) by replacing:
>
> Citizenship is a person switch with values Unregistered
> (default) and Registered, tracked by the Registrar. Changes to
> citizenship are secured. A registered person is a Player.
>
> A person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or prevented by the
> rules) register by publishing a message that indicates
> reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e intends
> to become a player at that time. A person, by registering,
> agrees to abide by the Rules. The Rules CANNOT otherwise bind a
> person to abide by any agreement without that person's willful
> consent.
>
> A player CAN deregister (cease being a player) by announcement.
> If e does so, e CANNOT register by announcement for 30 days.
>
> with:
>
> Citizenship is a person switch with values Unregistered
> (default) and Registered, tracked by the Registrar. Changes to
> citizenship are secured. A registered person is a Player.
> To "register" someone is to flip that person's Citizenship
> switch from Unregistered to Registered.
>
> An Unregistered person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or
> prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that
> indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e
> intends to become a player at that time. A player CAN deregister
> (cease being a player) by announcement. If e does so, e CANNOT
> register or be registered for 30 days.
>
> A person, by registering, agrees to abide by the Rules. The
> Rules CANNOT otherwise bind a person to abide by any agreement
> without that person's willful consent.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7932
> Title: A Reward for Obedience v5
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: ATMunn
> Co-authors: Aris, Alexis, G., V.J. Rada
>
>
> Repeal rule 2482, "Victory Elections"
>
> Create a new power-1 rule titled "Medals of Honour"
> {
> Medals of Honour are a destructible fixed currency tracked by the Herald.
>
> In the 7 days of an Agoran month, any player CAN declare emself to be
> eligible for a Medal of Honour by announcement if all of the following
> are true:
> * E has made at least 1 message to a public forum in the last Agoran
> month.
> * Eir Karma is not below -3.
> * In the last Agoran month, e has not had a Card issued to em.
>
> In the first 7 days of an Agoran month after the first 7 days, if there
> are any players who are eligible for a Medal of Honour, the Herald CAN,
> by announcement, initiate an Agoran Decision on who is to be awarded a
> Medal of Honour. E SHALL do so within the 7 days of an Agoran month after the
> first 7 days. For this decision, the valid votes are all players who are
> eligible for a Medal of Honour, the vote collector is the Herald, and the
> voting
> method is instant-runoff. Upon the resolution of this decision, the Herald
> CAN,
> and SHALL in a timely fashion, award the outcome of the decision a Medal of
> Honour by announcement. After a player is awarded a Medal of Honour, all
> players who were previously eligible for a Medal of Honour become no longer
> eligible.
>
> If, at any time, any player has 6 or more Medals of Honour, and e has
> not won via this rule previously, e can win the game by announcement,
> destroying all of eir Medals of Honour.
> }
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7933
> Title: Ribbon Preservation Act
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Alexis
> Co-authors:
>
> Amend rule 2438 by appending the following to the second paragraph:
>
> "If the rules are amended to change the types of Ribbon, if a player's Ribbon
> Ownership is subsequently illegal, then it is updated by removing all
> nonexistent types rather than resetting the entire value to default."
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7934
> Title: Poetry Duel Challenge Writ
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: 天火狐
> Co-authors:
> SILY PROPOSAL; OFFICIAL PROPOSAL
>
>
> A player CAN issue the title's writ
> once a month to another, who
> this month a different writ they yet remit,
> by having the first player pays its due
> of ten shinies and announces intent.
> If a party remits, they are disgraced;
> else the pair must to the public present
> a poem each which then Agorans be faced
> with a Decision of which one is better.
> Each task a timely manner it be done,
> The winner gains the loser as debtor,
> of whose function this rule shall provide none.
> The text above contitues a new rule
> whose title matches this proposal's; cool?
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7935
> Title: Revision Limits v2
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Trigon
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2201 "Self-Ratification" by removing the second paragraph and list.
>
> Create a new rule with power 3 entitled "Doubt" with the following text:
>
> A doubt is an explicit public challenge via one of the following
> methods, identifying a document and explaining the scope and
> nature of a perceived error in it:
>
> 1. An inquiry case, appropriate for questions of legal
> interpretation.
>
> 2. A claim of error, appropriate for matters of fact. The
> publisher of the original document SHALL (if e was required to
> publish that document) or SHOULD (otherwise) do one of the
> following in a timely fashion:
> A. Deny the claim (causing it to cease to be a doubt).
> B. Publish a revision.
> C. Initiate an inquiry case regarding the truth of the claim
> (if the subject is actually a matter of law), or cite a
> relevant existing inquiry case.
>
> Create a new rule with power 3 entitled "The Revision Limit" with the
> following
> text:
>
> The Revision Limit is an untracked natural singleton switch
> defaulting to 2 that CAN be set by any player without objection.
>
> If a report has had a number of revisions published to it greater
> than the revision limit, efforts by the player that published the
> report to collect a reward on eir next report are INEFFECTIVE.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7936
> Title: Print Money
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: V.J. Rada
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend rule 2487 "Shiny Supply Level" by replacing the number "1000"
> with the text "equal to 70 times the number of players" and by
> replacing "may" with "CAN and SHALL" and replacing "without 3
> Objections" to "once per Agoran month, in the first Agoran week of
> that month"
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7937
> Title: I Demand Faster Auctions
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: V.J. Rada
> Co-authors: o
>
>
> In rule 2491, replace "At the start of each month" with "At the
> start of each week"
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7938
> Title: Fix Campaign Proposals
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors: Ørjan
>
>
> Change the power of the rule entitled "Campaign Proposals, with power 3"
> to 3.0.
>
> Retitle the rule "Campaign Proposals, with power 3" to "Campaign Proposals".
>
> Amend the rule "Campaign Proposals" by replacing "and SHALL NOT be
> distributed as required by the rules" with "and SHALL NOT be distributed
> except as required by the rules".
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7939
> Title: Repeal the Reportor
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: V.J. Rada
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Repeal rule 2446 "The Agoran Newspaper"
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7940
> Title: High Power Cleanup
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Alexis
> Co-authors: G., Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
>
> Text in square brackets is not a substantive part of this proposal and is
> ignored when it takes effect.
>
> Amend Rule 105, bullet 2 to read "When a rule is repealed, it ceases
> to be a rule,
> its power is set to 0, and the Rulekeepor need no longer maintain a record
> of it."
>
> [There is a ruling that repealed rules have their power set to 0, but I'm
> not sure I fully agree with that conclusion; this makes it explicit which
> can't hurt anyway.]
>
> Amend Rule 106 by appending "Except insofar as the actions performed by a
> proposal happen one after another, rather than simultaneously, a proposal's
> effect is instantaneous. A proposal can neither delay nor extend its own
> effect. Once a propsal finishes taking effect, its power is set to 0."
>
> [Per discussion, do the same for proposals. While here, make it clear that
> proposals are instantaneous. Please nitpick this, I'm pretty sure it's safe
> but this is a very dangerous rule to get wrong.]
>
> Set the power of all entities other than Rules, Regulations, and this
> Proposal to 0. If rule 2493 was repealed, or the word "instrument" does not
> appear in its text, also set the power of all Regulations to 0.
>
> [This is a general cleanup that catches repealed rules and other entities.]
>
> Amend Rule 105, bullet 3 by appending "Unless specified otherwise by the
> re-enacting instrument, a re-enacted rule has power equal to the power it
> had at the time of its repeal (or power 1, if power was not defined at the
> time of that rule's repeal). If the re-enacting instrument is incapable of
> setting the re-enacted rule's power to that value, then the re-enactment is
> null and void."
>
> [Re-enactment currently doesn't have a specified power; this causes it to
> work roughly the way you would expect it to.]
>
> Amend Rule 1023 by appending "The same applies, mutatis mutandis, to for
> determining whether two points in time are within N months of each other,
> for N greater than or equal to 2." as a new paragraph in the fourth bullet
> in the first list.
>
> [This makes the logical extension to "within 6 months", which is used,
> explicit.]
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7941
> Title: HTML Scrubbing
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: V.J. Rada
> Co-authors:
>
>
> The Distributor is hereby requested to enable the Mailman feature(s) to
> strip non-plain-text parts of emails sent by the agoranomic.org mailing
> lists.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7942
> Title: No List Prefixes
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: V.J. Rada
> Co-authors:
>
>
> The Distributor is hereby requested to disable the DIS, BUS, and OFF
> prefixes automatically added to mail sent by the agoranomic.org mailing
> lists.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7943
> Title: Mini fixes
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: ATMunn
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend rule 2514, "Emotions", by replacing "registrar" with "Registrar"
>
> Amend rule 1650, "Silliness", by replacing "Each Nomic Week" with
> "Each Agoran week"
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7944
> Title: Who's the Secretary?
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: Trigon
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Replace all instances of the word "Secretary" in rule 2516: Passive Income
> with the word "Treasuror"
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7945
> Title: Name and Shame
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: Telnaior
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2168 ("Extending the voting period", power 1) thus:
> Modify the string
> "the vote collector for the decision SHALL issue a
> humiliating public reminder to the slackers who have not yet cast any
> votes on it despite being eligible"
> to
> "the vote collector for the decision SHALL issue a humiliating public
> reminder naming the slackers who have not yet cast any votes on it
> despite being eligible"
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7946
> Title: More Actions Should Use Agoran Consent
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Telnaior
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Flip the Citizenship switch of Ienpw III to Unregistered.
> Flip the Citizenship switch of Bayushi to Unregistered.
> Flip the Citizenship switch of ProofTechnique to Unregistered.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 7947
> Title: More Controversial Version of the Above
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: V.J. Rada
> Co-authors: Telnaior
>
>
> Deregister Murphy unless e objects during the voting period for this proposal
> and deregister omd unless e objects during the voting period for this proposal
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
