On Monday 19 November 2007, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Gratuitous argument: the assigning of an incorrect judgement is > historically the subject for an appeal, not another CFJ. An identical > case is here: > > http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1296
Not quite identical. There, the issue being challenged was whether the judge had considered past judgements, not whether the judgement was in accordance with the Rules. It was dismissed based on a rule which, AFAIK, no longer exists.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
