On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > More confusing than having to inspect the entire case history in order > >> > to determine what panels exist? > >> > >> No, but the proposed revision would eliminate both. > > > > I'm not sure what revision you're referring to. I've only seen the > > original version of the proto. > > I'm referring to the proto as "the revision" (of the existing rules).
How does it eliminate potentially creating a brand new panel for each appeal case? My complaint was that it introduces this. -root
