On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (To forestall discussion on another detail, I assume that type of > "agreement" > > referred to in R101 is the same as "agreements made" by judicial panels, > as > > there is no qualifying text to the contrary). > > The use of the word "binding" in R101 is not qualifying text? I > thought it was clear that R101 is referring to contracts, whereas > R2157 is referring to agreement of opinion.
It also occurs to me that if we do interpret R2157 as referring to contracts, then no panel I'm on ever has validly assigned a judgement, as I certainly haven't entered binding agreements in those cases. -root
