On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (To forestall discussion on another detail, I assume that type of "agreement" > referred to in R101 is the same as "agreements made" by judicial panels, as > there is no qualifying text to the contrary).
The use of the word "binding" in R101 is not qualifying text? I thought it was clear that R101 is referring to contracts, whereas R2157 is referring to agreement of opinion. -root
