On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Still, I believe that the Promotor CANNOT distribute the proposal in > question, and the message's claim to have been published by "invalid > invalid" (who is not a player) will self-ratify, meaning the proposal > was never legal.
Only if the author denies my CoE. Besides which, I don't think the "invalid invalid" should be taken as a claim of identity, given that the message clearly identifies the sender as an anonymous player elsewhere. -root
