On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Indentification is not a toggle, but where the attempt interacts with the > rules, ultimately a "yes communicated" or "no not communicated" switch/ > decision/judgement must be made. For the purposes of the rules, this > is clearly on the side of "not identified".
I'm not disputing that. My point was just that if the identification self-ratifies, it would ratify as having been sent by an anonymous player, however the rules might interpret that later on. -root
