On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 10:25 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > Sir Toby wrote: > > > Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > >>> Identification is not a toggle switch with values "unambiguously > >>> identified" and "completely unidentified". The message identifies its > >>> sender as a player, which is ambiguous but still communicates much > >>> more than if it contained no statement of identification at all. > >> Just like writing a message in Turkish and identifying the language > >> as Turkish clearly communicates that there is a message but for the > >> purposes of the rules doesn't communicate the content. You know the > >> CFJ of which I speak. > > > > I do not know of this CFJ. Can someone illuminate me please? > > I can't find it, but I believe it involved someone using the Turkish > word for a vote value (without identifying the language, even).
CFJs 910 and 915 look relevant, although they don't seem to be the one you're talking about. -- ais523
