On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 08:23, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hm. That is weird indeed. See, this should work fine: the RBoA transactions > are > liberal but the rest are conservative, just like it's always been: > > if target == 'RBoA': > while comrades[person] < amount: > note = "originally tried to transfer ^%i but doesn't have > that much" % (orig_amount,) > amount -= 1 > say_amount = '^%i' % (amount,) > else: > if comrades[person] < amount: > fails = True > note = 'only has ^%i' % (comrades[person],) > > > So... I really have no idea. > I'm not sure either. Can we ratify the gamestate of the PBA to what my report would show at 00:00 on Nov 6 (just prior to Wooble's most recent transaction)? Then you can use whatever policy you wish going forward (there should be no further direct RBOA transactions, so no more special casing), and I'll ensure my recordkeeping conforms to your policy.
BobTHJ
