On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 12:40 -0700, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 12:31 -0700, Ian Kelly wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> And with necessary support, I filibuster 5842-5941.
> >> >>
> >> > I intend, with 4 supporting senators, to end these filibusters.
> >>
> >> I post the following Sell Ticket:
> >>
> >> * Cost: 15 VP
> >> * Action: Cause myself and two other first-class senators to support
> >> these attempts to end the
> >> filibusters on proposals 5842-5941.
> >>
> >> I affirm that I have contracts with two other first-class senators of the
> >> form:
> > Senators don't have to be first-class to break filibusters, do they? The
> > rule says "with four supporting senators". Maybe I'll go and bribe some
> > partnerships, it's probably cheaper.
>
> Only first-class players can support dependent actions, period.
>
What dependent action? Read rule 1728(a).
--
ais523
