On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There is no more an ambiguity in meaning here than there is when >> somebody announces "I go on hold" as opposed to "I perform the action >> 'to go on old'". > > Upon further reflection, I don't think any of these interpretations > fixes anything. The default is "with N first-class player supports". > This is "with N Senator supports". Still allows second-class support.
R2124 only allows further restriction on the eligibility of supporters, not redefinition, and it takes precedence over R2177. -root
