On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no more an ambiguity in meaning here than there is when
> somebody announces "I go on hold" as opposed to "I perform the action
> 'to go on old'".
Upon further reflection, I don't think any of these interpretations
fixes anything. The default is "with N first-class player supports".
This is "with N Senator supports". Still allows second-class support.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
