On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > comex wrote: > >> [I've complained repeatedly about the length of time currently >> required to adopt proposals, which can have a significant negative >> effect on the game. Since the current proposal volume really isn't >> all that high, I think that BlogNomic-style immediate distribution is >> not only feasible, but a significant improvement over what we have >> now, and not much extra work for the Assessor or voters.] > > It most certainly /would/ dump a lot of extra work on the Assessor, > if only because lots of votes would be sent in response to the authors' > individual ID-number-less distribution messages.
Well. The lack of ID numbers would basically force people to vote in replies, rather than the current situation where vote formats are everywhere on the map; and in most email clients, collecting all the replies to a given message is very easy. So to me it seems essentially easier...
