On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> Like I've said, I support the return of contract law. In fact I'm working on >> a proto at the minute. > > The point is, we don't need complex charters for the basic "let's > run a sub-game based around an event and have it go away after a > couple months" thing. It was just one, not-controversial or hard- > to adjudicate rule. -G.
I proposed to repeal it because in 2.5 years it's been used successfully at most once, and at that rate you may as well just make the contest into a rule, which allows it to affect the rest of the gamestate as needed and, in practice, seems to force people to write higher quality charters (at least, compared to the language we used to see in contracts). *shrug*
