On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Alex Smith wrote: > There's been quite a bit of effort in this to shut down possible scams > pre-emptively; in particular, I've tried my best to prevent anything > similar to Fool's attempted scam, and any scams along the line of "I > repeatedly generate random results until I get one I like, then send > just that one to a public forum".
I mentioned dislike of the dice-server concept in the last email, but just to respond to this: this one's easy to toss out in Court, because it can be shown that the resulting process (dice + selection) does not match the underlying probability distribution.
