On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 10:30 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Alex Smith wrote: > > There's been quite a bit of effort in this to shut down possible scams > > pre-emptively; in particular, I've tried my best to prevent anything > > similar to Fool's attempted scam, and any scams along the line of "I > > repeatedly generate random results until I get one I like, then send > > just that one to a public forum". > > I mentioned dislike of the dice-server concept in the last email, but > just to respond to this: this one's easy to toss out in Court, because > it can be shown that the resulting process (dice + selection) does not > match the underlying probability distribution.
So what if you set up an email relay that delays messages with results you don't like by a fixed amount of time, and send a huge number of random results through that relay? -- ais523
