On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 10:55 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I should note: I'm thinking of this broadly, and wondering if we should > place a generic definition of "random choice" back in the ruleset so > defining "random" (and penalties for cheating random) doesn't have to > fall on your Org rules.
I'd like a generic "random" definition. Preferably one that comes with a non-binding encouragement to do the rolls in a way that's hard to fake. -- ais523
