There's probably no harm in doing all since shinies aren't super-important right now and most people have a surplus anyway, but it is worth discussing. The way I see it there's two main possibilities:
-Apply a solid payrate to every office and then a separate payment for each report. Best for offices with reports, which are often the busiest (but not necessarily the most important). -Apply different payrate to different offices, and then a separate payment for each report. Potentially better for less report-based offices, but a bit more complex and potentially prone to a lot of nitpicking about which offices are more deserving. On 05/01/17 21:19, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> A potential compromise: Lower the payrate for all offices and add a separate >> payment for reports published, paid to the player who published it. An >> unproductive officeholder would get some but not much, a productive one >> would get a lot. Deputization would have a more direct reward. And if an >> officeholder is becoming busy, e could resign without losing pay for eir >> previous work. >> > Sounds good to me. Want to try it on just some offices first, or > should we do it for all of them? > > > -Aris
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
