SnuggleWand could've indeed - the CFJ is indeed in a peculiar mess, which is why I recently introduced recusal, so if someone gets a case they just don't wanna deal with (which happened to PuddleGleam here) then ey can recuse themselves instead of holding up the judicial system.
V.J. - It might be good to Point a Finger at TheBeaminator for eir pledge breaking, as that would serve em right for breaking a pledge (I could obviously do it too, but i'm having too much fun coming up with new nick-names for Old Beam Boy (or Girl)) On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 8:07 PM V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Apologies for the triple-post, but CB could have just expressed > disinterest in the darn thing. > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:01 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This message is just for the convenience of those not caught up, as I >> was not. >> >> Oh dear God just read the full mess. CB (this is a valid nickname, don't >> even think about it) submitted a message *pledging* not to submit >> judgement. Gaelan then attempted to ratify a document stating that 3509 >> was judgeless, which was objected to by o. The player also known as >> CuddleBeam who I shall now refer to as UberJeff submitted a clearly >> incorrect Judgement of DISMISS, based on the fact that he couldn't be >> bothered to read the rules. Your message states that UberJeff moved for >> reconsideration, but actually Publius moved for it, which UberJeff >> supported. UberJeff then went back to eir original stance of not >> submitting >> one. >> >> It is clear that UberJeff broke eir pledge not to judge the judgement. >> It is also clear that, as UberJeff emself admits, their original >> judgement is >> clearly wrong. UberJeff should be carded, the initial judgement should be >> counted as authoritative, weshould moot that judgement and give the CFJ >> to a different judge. >> >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:41 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Is it legal to move for you to reconsider your own judgement and then >>> not judge it? I feel like this should be counted as a refusal to reconsider >>> and we should thus count the original judgement (and Moot it if necessary). >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:47 AM, CuddleBeam <cuddleb...@googlemail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm not going to give Judgement on that, because while I am honestly >>>> able to give Judgement (and would Judge TRUE, because I agree with Gaelan), >>>> I won't engage in tit for tat and cards for cards because I believe it's >>>> wrong, even if our Justice system commands me to. >>>> >>> >>> >> >
