Yes, PSS made the motion. However, a recent CFJ explicitly ruled that this case could be reassigned. O was the judge. Youre good.
On Wednesday, June 28, 2017, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-06-10 at 13:48 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > First, CuddleBeam clearly delivered a judgement in 3509, then filed a > > > Motion to Reconsider it. That first part worked fine. > > > > Can someone point me to the Motion to Reconsider? Looking back through > > the lists, I've found two attempts to resolve one and no intent. > > Obviously, if the CFJ wasn't Reconsidered, I can't reassign it. > > Ok, re-reading everything I can find, I agree, there's nothing I can find > actually worded as an Intent (and CuddleBeam supported a supposed intent > but didn't actually file). I must have misread something when I posted > the above. Sorry about the confusion. > > > (Sorry for not catching up on this earlier. I've been short on time, > > especially for Agora, and handling tardy judges and > > recusals/reassignments/reconsiderations is much more timeconsuming than > > the initial assignment, in addition to not currently having a rules- > > mandated deadline, so I keep postponing it.) > > I intended to do a weekly update to the archives including a "these > judgements > are late" informational post, but I, too, have fallen behind in the time- > consuming stuff these past couple weeks. Sorry. > > >
