Where did you post the reconsideration? I only find the original Judgement.

> El 5 jul 2017, a las 22:19, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> escribió:
> 
> Posting to business because each A-D post might
> be a seperate breach.
> 
> I already moved to reconsider and did so. You can
> now intend to, with two support, enter the judgement
> into Moot, which will trigger a vote.
> 
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I intend to motion to reconsider based on "Whether the winning bid can 
>> actually make a transfer or not shouldn't affect if there is actually an 
>> *auction* or not in the first place, I believe."
>> 
>> Enviado desde mi iPhone
>> 
>>> El 5 jul 2017, a las 18:34, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> escribió:
>>> 
>>> I motion to reconsider.
>>> 
>>> Whether the winning bid can actually make a transfer or not shouldn't 
>>> affect if there is actually an *auction* or not in the first place, I 
>>> believe.
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:14 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm judging this FALSE. GASP! Surprise rocks the nation.
>>>> I'm not judging it FALSE because auctioning is a regulated
>>>> action though. It seems to me that despite the auction
>>>> provisions, people could auction their own property
>>>> without breaching the rules. I'm judging it based on the fact
>>>> that Estate ownership is regulated, and CB's attempt to auction
>>>> off Estates owned by another entity (Agora) and person (Josh)
>>>> does not work.
>>>> 
>>>> "A player who owns an Estate can and may transfer it to any
>>>> player, to any Organization, or to Agora, by announcement"
>>>> from rule 2489 regulates Estate ownership, as does the auction
>>>> provision. This, mixed with the fact that the ordinary meaning of
>>>> the word "Owner" means someone who can control their 
>>>> property, precludes anyone from taking an Estate from its owner
>>>> or causing it to be taken from em, unless specifically authorized
>>>> by rule (such as the auction provision).
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 2017-07-02 at 02:21 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote:
>>>>> > The moment is ripe to attempt something like this, because it's Auction
>>>>> > time. Let's go:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Putting Estates up to Auction is an unregulated action, much like
>>>>> > withdrawing. (I don't personally believe this - because I believe all
>>>>> > actions in the universe are Regulated - but many others do, so I'm going
>>>>> > off that). In case its of doubt, the following states an obligation for 
>>>>> > the
>>>>> > Surveyor to perform, so its not a description of "circumstances under 
>>>>> > which
>>>>> > the action would succeed or fail":
>>>>> >
>>>>> > "At the start of each month, if Agora owns at least one Estate, the
>>>>> > Surveyor shall put one Estate which is owned by Agora up for auction, by
>>>>> > announcement. Each auction ends seven days after it begins."
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Additionally, the state of being in an auction or not is tracked by 
>>>>> > nobody,
>>>>> > so it doesn't infringe "would, as part of its effect, modify information
>>>>> > for which some player is required to be a recordkeepor"
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Therefore:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > - I put every Estate up for Auction, (even those owned by other 
>>>>> > players, if
>>>>> > possible).
>>>>> > - I then bid a million shinies on each of them.
>>>>> > - I then bid one shiny on each of them.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I have absolutely no defense towards other people bidding more than a
>>>>> > million and using my own "scam" to win auctions, which only works versus
>>>>> > the "conventional" way of winning them by bidding amounts of cash you
>>>>> > actually own.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I CFJ: "There is currently more than one auction for Estates"
>>>>> >
>>>>> > That's all.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is CFJ 3537. I assign it to V.J. Rada.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> ais523
>>>>> Arbitor
> 

Reply via email to