I like this. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 7:08 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > >> >> On Sep 7, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >> >> >>> On Sep 7, 2017, at 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>>> It doesn't take 30 days due to a bug. >>> [...] >>>> I'd think about doing so as a protest; the difficulty towards casual >>>> player economic participation has been pointed out and so far in >>>> conversations, the designers of the system either aren't seeing the >>>> great urgency to fix it, or think it's a feature. >>> >>> Actually, as I think of it, maybe some political hardball is in order >>> here (there's not enough political wheeling-dealing that goes along >>> here - among other things, this game is legislative simulation after >>> all!) >>> >>> The registration bug is a form of economic protest, usable by the >>> have-nots. So I state my intention: I will vote AGAINST any fix to >>> the registration bug (which requires AI-3 to pass) until economic >>> reforms for basic income are included/addressed. >> >> I am, at least, already well convinced of the necessity. I just haven’t made >> the time to write a proposal about it. I do have a couple of loose ideas: >> >> * Allow any player to receive a payment from Agora at most once a week, >> without objection, if and only if no player has fewer shinies than they do. >> >> * Allow the Secretary/Treasuror to cause Agora to pay anyone, with consent, >> out of Agora’s coffers, with a SHOULD guideline to use that power to >> compensate for income gaps, or at the expense of immediately triggering an >> election for the office, or something. > > * Redirect some proportion of each payment to Agora to the player with the > fewest Shinies, with a mechanism for breaking ties (such as “in registration > order”). > > -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
