On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 23:54 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Yup. It only pauses it for 48 hours though, so in current context > > useless unless I keep renewing it, and it's been around a while. > > Is it even possible to object to the same intent twice? Rule 2124 used > to use "objector" which is precisely defined, and still does in most > cases. However, the new Speaker clause uses "objected" which isn't > precisely defined, and the addition of a time limit makes it unclear > exactly how it works. (Note that whatever objecting is, it definitely > /isn't/ an action by announcement; it might or might not be related to > posting an objection, which also isn't an action by announcement, but > we normally treat an "I object" announcement as being an objection.)
I think my recent judgement of 3567 implies that "objecting" as a natural speech act can be done multiple times, though only the first time labels you as an "objector" (it makes the point that it's not a by-announcement action). Same with announcing intent. Though since it wasn't a direct question from the CFJ statement, 3567 is likely supporting but not final word on this.
